June 19, 2025

Episode 1: 5 Website Mistakes of Green-tech Startups

Logo of Adopter - the marketing agency for deep tech and climate adaptation.

Matt Jaworski, co-founder of Adopter, discusses the five most common website mistakes made by early-stage and scaling green technology companies on Episode 2 of Scaling Green Tech, a podcast by Adopter.

Jaworski's core argument is that a website functions as the first due diligence step for investors, partners, and customers - and that neglecting it is a business decision with real commercial consequences. He traces how this plays out across five specific failure modes: a missing or outdated site that loses a warm investor introduction before it begins; aspirational mission copy that fails to answer what the company actually does; vendor lock-in that leaves founders paying for five-minute updates; unscalable platforms that require rebuilding every few years; and the use of stock or AI-generated images where real laboratory and facility photography is expected. A Gartner report found that over 60% of B2B buyers visit a company website before their first meeting.

This episode is relevant for green technology founders preparing for investor outreach, early-stage deep tech companies building or rebuilding their first website, and programme managers at venture builders who support portfolio companies on go-to-market readiness.

Key Takeaways

  • Over 60% of B2B buyers visit a company's website before their first meeting, according to a Gartner report pre-pandemic - a proportion Jaworski and Keddie expect has grown since.
  • A venture builder programme manager described an investor declining to respond to a warm startup introduction because the company's website showed nothing relevant. The investor crossed the company out based on the website alone, before any conversation took place.
  • Failing to maintain a website is still a marketing choice. Companies that go without one signal to investors and partners that they are not operational or ready to commercialise.
  • Mission statements such as "we make the world a better place" or "we make this industry more sustainable" do not answer the questions investors and customers need answered: what do you do, who do you do it for?
  • The "caveman test" in website design asks whether a first-time visitor can understand the core offering without prior knowledge of the company or sector.
  • Vendor lock-in occurs when a website is built in a way that only its original developer can edit, leaving founders unable to make routine content changes without paying for each one.
  • AI-generated and stock images on a green tech website create credibility risk. Investors and partners expect photography of real laboratories, facilities, and operations.
  • Stanford University's persuasive technology lab has published Stanford Guidelines for Web Credibility covering case studies, testimonials, and other traction signals relevant to early-stage companies.

FAQs

  1. Why does a green tech startup need a website before it has customers? 

A website is the first place investors, partners, and prospective customers go after an introduction. An absent or outdated site can end an investor conversation before it begins. Jaworski describes a case in which a strong startup-investor match produced no response because the website showed nothing relevant. The website does not need to be elaborate. It needs to be accurate, current, and clear about what the company does.

  1. What is the "caveman test" in website design? 

The caveman test asks whether a first-time visitor with no prior knowledge of the company could understand the core offering from the homepage. For green tech founders with complex technologies, passing it means removing jargon and directly answering the most common visitor questions: what do you do, who do you do it for, and why does it matter? It is not about dumbing down. It is about removing unnecessary friction for the reader.

  1. What is website vendor lock-in and how does it affect green tech companies? 

Vendor lock-in happens when a website is built in a way that only the original developer can update or expand it. Founders then face high costs for routine changes. For a scaling green tech company that is pivoting, adding services, or preparing for investment, this creates a dependency that slows the business down. Modern CMS platforms resolve this by giving the founding team full content control from day one.

  1. What is the difference between a scalable and an unscalable website platform? 

A scalable platform allows non-technical team members to add pages, update copy, and publish new content without developer involvement. An unscalable platform - typically a bespoke custom-coded site or an outdated CMS - requires specialist knowledge for every change. Jaworski notes that modern low-code and no-code platforms address both scalability and vendor lock-in simultaneously.

  1. Why are stock images and AI-generated images a problem for green tech websites? 

When a business uses stock or AI-generated images, it raises questions about whether the company is operational. For investors evaluating an early-stage green tech company, real photography - of laboratories, equipment, and facilities - signals that the technology exists and is at the claimed development stage. Stanford University's web credibility guidelines identify real-world evidence as a core trust signal.

  1. What does traction look like on an early-stage green tech website? 

Traction signals include real photography of facilities and operations, case studies showing pilot or deployment results, named partners or customers, and testimonials. For very early-stage companies, laboratory or prototype photography is more credible than stock imagery because it confirms the technology is active. Stanford University's persuasive technology lab covers these signals in detail in their web credibility guidelines.

Topics Covered

  • Why a website matters for early-stage green tech companies
  • How investors use websites in their due diligence process
  • Mistake 1 - Neglecting the website entirely
  • The investor story: a lost warm introduction due to an outdated website
  • Mistake 2 - Poor messaging and unclear value propositions
  • The caveman test for website clarity
  • Mistake 3 - Vendor lock-in and losing control of your website
  • Mistake 4 - Unscalable platforms that require rebuilding
  • Mistake 5 - Stock and AI-generated images instead of real-world photography
  • Stanford web credibility guidelines and traction signals

Related Content

Episode 12: How to Win on LinkedIn in 2025 - A Founder’s Guide to Real Engagement

Episode 9: Turning Insights Into Impact - Auditing Your Online Presence

Green Claims Without Greenwashing: How to Communicate Your Message Responsibly 

About Scaling Green-Tech

Scaling Green-Tech by Adopter is a podcast for people shaping the future of climate technology - founders, investors, and ecosystem leaders at the forefront of adaptation and resilience solutions. As part of Adopter’s mission to accelerate the adoption of high-impact climate innovation, the podcast aims to amplify real voices and practical insights that can help others navigate the startup journey. These conversations go beyond the hype to bring real, unfiltered stories - the wins, the roadblocks and everything you need to know in between.

Read the full transcript here
illustration of Earth